Skip Navigation : Help for people with disabilities : Subsection navigation
Reviews
Book TitleLa denuncia de los tratados. Régimen en la Convención de Viena sobre el derecho de los tratados de 1969 y práctica estatal
Book AuthorPérez, Elena Conde
Bibliographic InformationCongreso d los Diputados, 2007, Pages : 258, €9, ISBN 9788479433031

Review Title
Reviewer(s) Binder, Christina

Short review

Elena Conde Pérez. La denuncia de los tratados. Régimen en la Convención de Viena sobre el derecho de los tratados de 1969 y práctica estatal. Madrid: Congreso de los Diputados, 2007. Pp. 258. €9. ISBN: 9788479433031.

 

Reviewed by Christina Binder, University of Vienna

 

 

Treaties are the major legal instruments governing inter-state relations and an indispensable tool for diplomacy: since 1945 some 54.000 treaties have been registered with the United Nations, still representing only about 70 percent of treaties which have entered into force (A. Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd ed., 2007, p. 1).  

 

Recently, there has been a renewed doctrinal interest in the general law of treaties. It is evidenced by the spread of commentaries on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), including Corten/Klein’s major three volume commentary in the French language of 2006; Villiger’s commentary of 2009 and the forthcoming updated English translation of Corten/Klein which is announced for fall 2010. Aust’s Modern Treaty Law and Practice which was published 2007 in its second edition may also be mentioned here. This new wave of publications is remarkable given the fact that for more than 30 years Sinclair’s The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties was de facto the only authoritative treatise on the Convention.

 

Notwithstanding the recent scholarly interest in the general law of treaties, only few monographs specifically on treaty termination have been published. These were mostly dedicated to specific aspects of denunciation. (See e.g. Feist’s Kündigung, Rücktritt und Suspendierung von multilateralen Verträgen of 2001; Gomaa’s Suspension or Termination of Treaties on Grounds of Breach of 1996; Kontou’s The Termination and Revision of Treaties in the Light of New Customary International Law of 1994, Pott’s Clausula rebus sic stantibus: ein Versuch ihres Wesens, ihrer Voraussetzungen und ihrer Rechtsfolgen (Art. 62 WVK)  of 1992 or Vamvoukos’ Termination of Treaties in International law: The Doctrines of Rebus Sic Stantibus and Desuetude of 1985). Against that background, Elena Conde Pérez’ investigation on the VCLT’s regime of treaty denunciation addresses an important shortcoming.

 

The author examines comprehensively the different forms of treaty denunciation with a particular focus on the termination/withdrawal grounds under general international law. While emphasis is laid on the grounds which are contained in the VCLT – denunciation of a treaty containing no provision regarding denunciation (Art. 56 VCLT), breach of treaty (Art. 60 VCLT), impossibility of performance (Art. 61 VCLT), fundamental change of circumstances (Art. 62 VCLT) and ius cogens superveniens (Art. 64 VCLT) – some mention is also made of possible denunciation grounds which are not included in the VCLT: desuetudo, armed conflict, territorial changes and breach of consular or diplomatic relations.  

 

La denuncia de los tratados is structured rather classically. Chapter II – which as regards extent and content forms the central chapter of the book – is dedicated to the different denunciation grounds. Other chapters deal with formal/procedural requirements of denunciation (Chapter III), dispute resolution (Chapter VI) and the consequences of termination (Chapter VII). One chapter examines treaty denunciation under Spanish law (Chapter V), another discusses the treaty denouncing capacity of subjects of international law (Chapter IV). A preface (Prólogo) by L.I. Sánches Rodríguez provides a general introduction to the topic. Likewise, a rather extensive bibliography including Spanish, French and Italian references is provided, while an index and a table of treaties and cases are missing.

 

Elena Conde Pérez meticulously compiles relevant materials and oeuvres on treaty denunciation. She provides a good overview and assembles relevant case law concerning the different denunciation grounds. In doing so, the author also undertakes certain attempts of systematization, in particular when classifying possible treaty clauses which allow for denunciation (pp. 40).

 

Given the mentioned scarcity of research, the book fills an important gap in the existing literature: this even more, as it addresses issues which have not been extensively dealt with so far. It discusses the role of the depositary (including the problem of multiple depositaries) in the denunciation procedures (pp. 156 et seq.); the capacity of parties to denounce a treaty (including protectorates, non recognized governments or governments in exile (pp. 162 et seq.)); the problems of denunciation of mixed agreements (pp. 167 et seq.) and denunciation by states which are not parties to the treaty (eg third states which are obliged by a provision of a treaty in accordance with Arts. 35-37 VCLT (pp. 171 et seq.)); as well as denunciation by other subjects of international law, such as national liberation movements, occupied states or states under Tutela (territorial administration) pp. 172 et seq.). Furthermore, the analysis and description of Spanish procedures and institutions provide relevant insights into the Spanish practice of treaty denunciation (pp. 175 et seq.).

 

Regrettably, however, Conde Pérez does not go into much depth in her analysis. She remains rather descriptive when examining the case law and partly restricts herself to enumerating the elements of the relevant provisions of the VCLT (see e.g. the discussion of the denunciation procedure and system for the resolution of conflicts (Arts. 65-68 VCLT and annexes; pp. 195, pp. 205 et seq.). Doctrinal problems are barely touched upon by Conde Pérez, such as the question whether the term “object” in Art. 61 VCLT also comprises legal regimes; the relation between Art. 62 VCLT and treaty specific termination clauses in cases of fundamental changes of circumstances; or issues linked to the broad framing of the provisions concerning the consequences of termination (Arts. 70, 71 VCLT). In part, this may be explained with the limited case law and practice, as many of the VCLT’s provisions in Part V (Termination, Suspension and Withdrawal) have rarely – if at all – been relied upon and applied. To exemplify, the VCLT’s system on the resolution of conflicts has never been used and certain theoretical problems thus have not been tested in practice. Still, they remain of considerable academic interest and are not sufficiently dealt with in La denuncia de los tratados which addresses only few of the legal problems linked to the different denunciation grounds.

 

Likewise it is regrettable that the conclusion (pp. 229 et seq.) does not go much beyond what was already said before. In addition, Conde Pérez’ final appreciation of the VCLT’s system of denunciation as confuse, incomplete and ambiguous (p. 241) seems too extreme. Her claim also lacks sufficient substantiation. For instance, the author fails to mention the difficult balance the drafters of the VCLT had to strike between generality and completeness. As a general treaty supposed to regulate a multitude of different situations, the VCLT’s denunciation regime necessarily had to be kept rather abstract and general. Still, the VCLT lays out guiding rules for international practice. Thus, other authors arrived at rather different conclusions: the VCLT – including the denunciation regime – was held to be the “bible of practitioners”, the “prime achievement of the International Law Commission”, whose “intelligence of […] drafting has enabled states to continue or modify their practice without distorting or departing from the rules of the Convention.” (A. Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd ed., 2007, pp. 7-8.).

                                                             

In a nutshell, it is mainly the assemblage of relevant case law and the references to works on treaty law in Spanish, French and Italian which make La denuncia de los tratados an important contribution to the existing literature on treaty termination. With respect to the doctrinal problems surrounding treaty denunciation the book, however, generates only few additional insights.